+ mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/nommu.c: drop unlikely inside BUG_ON()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/nommu.c: drop unlikely inside BUG_ON()

(1) For !CONFIG_BUG cases, the bug call is a no-op, so we couldn't
    care less and the change is ok.

(2) ppc and mips, which HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON, do not rely on branch
    predictions as it seems to be pointless[1] and thus callers should not
    be trying to push an optimization in the first place.

(3) For CONFIG_BUG and !HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON cases, BUG_ON() contains an
    unlikely compiler flag already.

Hence, we can drop unlikely behind BUG_ON().

[1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1101.3/02289.html

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/nommu.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/nommu.c~mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on mm/nommu.c
--- a/mm/nommu.c~mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on
+++ a/mm/nommu.c
@@ -578,16 +578,16 @@ static noinline void validate_nommu_regi
 		return;
 
 	last = rb_entry(lastp, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
-	BUG_ON(unlikely(last->vm_end <= last->vm_start));
-	BUG_ON(unlikely(last->vm_top < last->vm_end));
+	BUG_ON(last->vm_end <= last->vm_start);
+	BUG_ON(last->vm_top < last->vm_end);
 
 	while ((p = rb_next(lastp))) {
 		region = rb_entry(p, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
 		last = rb_entry(lastp, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
 
-		BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_end <= region->vm_start));
-		BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_top < region->vm_end));
-		BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_start < last->vm_top));
+		BUG_ON(region->vm_end <= region->vm_start);
+		BUG_ON(region->vm_top < region->vm_end);
+		BUG_ON(region->vm_start < last->vm_top);
 
 		lastp = p;
 	}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from geliangtang@xxxxxxx are

mm-nommu-drop-unlikely-behind-bug_on.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux