The patch titled
Subject: memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg: flatten task_struct->memcg_oom
task_struct->memcg_oom is a sub-struct containing fields which are used
for async memcg oom handling. Most task_struct fields aren't packaged
this way and it can lead to unnecessary alignment paddings. This patch
flattens it.
* task.memcg_oom.memcg -> task.memcg_in_oom
* task.memcg_oom.gfp_mask -> task.memcg_oom_gfp_mask
* task.memcg_oom.order -> task.memcg_oom_order
* task.memcg_oom.may_oom -> task.memcg_may_oom
In addition, task.memcg_may_oom is relocated to where other bitfields are
which reduces the size of task_struct.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/sched.h | 13 ++++++-------
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++--------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom include/linux/memcontrol.h
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -407,19 +407,19 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct me
static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
{
- WARN_ON(current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
- current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 1;
+ WARN_ON(current->memcg_may_oom);
+ current->memcg_may_oom = 1;
}
static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_disable(void)
{
- WARN_ON(!current->memcg_oom.may_oom);
- current->memcg_oom.may_oom = 0;
+ WARN_ON(!current->memcg_may_oom);
+ current->memcg_may_oom = 0;
}
static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return p->memcg_oom.memcg;
+ return p->memcg_in_oom;
}
bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool wait);
diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom
+++ a/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1451,7 +1451,9 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
unsigned sched_migrated:1;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+ unsigned memcg_may_oom:1;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
unsigned memcg_kmem_skip_account:1;
#endif
@@ -1782,12 +1784,9 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned long trace_recursion;
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
- struct memcg_oom_info {
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- gfp_t gfp_mask;
- int order;
- unsigned int may_oom:1;
- } memcg_oom;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg_in_oom;
+ gfp_t memcg_oom_gfp_mask;
+ int memcg_oom_order;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
struct uprobe_task *utask;
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem
static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
{
- if (!current->memcg_oom.may_oom)
+ if (!current->memcg_may_oom)
return;
/*
* We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we
@@ -1669,9 +1669,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
* and when we know whether the fault was overall successful.
*/
css_get(&memcg->css);
- current->memcg_oom.memcg = memcg;
- current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask = mask;
- current->memcg_oom.order = order;
+ current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
+ current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
+ current->memcg_oom_order = order;
}
/**
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cg
*/
bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool handle)
{
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_oom.memcg;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = current->memcg_in_oom;
struct oom_wait_info owait;
bool locked;
@@ -1721,8 +1721,8 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
if (locked && !memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait);
- mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom.gfp_mask,
- current->memcg_oom.order);
+ mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask,
+ current->memcg_oom_order);
} else {
schedule();
mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool han
memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
}
cleanup:
- current->memcg_oom.memcg = NULL;
+ current->memcg_in_oom = NULL;
css_put(&memcg->css);
return true;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from tj@xxxxxxxxxx are
memcg-flatten-task_struct-memcg_oom.patch
memcg-punt-high-overage-reclaim-to-return-to-userland-path.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
