[merged] mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: fix a misleading comment
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: fix a misleading comment

The comment says that the per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are
determined by present_pages which is definitely wrong, they are both
calculated from managed_pages.  Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt |    4 ++--
 mm/page_alloc.c             |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt~mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
--- a/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt~mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment
+++ a/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ zone[i]'s protection[j] is calculated by
 
 (i < j):
   zone[i]->protection[j]
-  = (total sums of present_pages from zone[i+1] to zone[j] on the node)
+  = (total sums of managed_pages from zone[i+1] to zone[j] on the node)
     / lowmem_reserve_ratio[i];
 (i = j):
    (should not be protected. = 0;
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ The default values of lowmem_reserve_rat
     256 (if zone[i] means DMA or DMA32 zone)
     32  (others).
 As above expression, they are reciprocal number of ratio.
-256 means 1/256. # of protection pages becomes about "0.39%" of total present
+256 means 1/256. # of protection pages becomes about "0.39%" of total managed
 pages of higher zones on the node.
 
 If you would like to protect more pages, smaller values are effective.
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-a-terrible-misleading-comment
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6022,7 +6022,7 @@ void __init mem_init_print_info(const ch
  * set_dma_reserve - set the specified number of pages reserved in the first zone
  * @new_dma_reserve: The number of pages to mark reserved
  *
- * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by present_pages.
+ * The per-cpu batchsize and zone watermarks are determined by managed_pages.
  * In the DMA zone, a significant percentage may be consumed by kernel image
  * and other unfreeable allocations which can skew the watermarks badly. This
  * function may optionally be used to account for unfreeable pages in the
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx are


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux