The patch titled Subject: list_lru: don't call list_lru_from_kmem if the list_head is empty has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was list_lru-dont-call-list_lru_from_kmem-if-the-list_head-is-empty.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: list_lru: don't call list_lru_from_kmem if the list_head is empty If the list_head is empty then we'll have called list_lru_from_kmem for nothing. Move that call inside of the list_empty if block. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/list_lru.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/list_lru.c~list_lru-dont-call-list_lru_from_kmem-if-the-list_head-is-empty mm/list_lru.c --- a/mm/list_lru.c~list_lru-dont-call-list_lru_from_kmem-if-the-list_head-is-empty +++ a/mm/list_lru.c @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l; spin_lock(&nlru->lock); - l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); if (list_empty(item)) { + l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); list_add_tail(item, &l->list); l->nr_items++; spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); @@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l; spin_lock(&nlru->lock); - l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); if (!list_empty(item)) { + l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item); list_del_init(item); l->nr_items--; spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html