The patch titled Subject: mm/dmapool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in dma_pool_destroy() has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-dmapool-allow-null-pool-pointer-in-dma_pool_destroy.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm/dmapool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in dma_pool_destroy() dma_pool_destroy() does not tolerate a NULL dma_pool pointer argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. This requires additional attention and effort from developers/reviewers and forces all dma_pool_destroy() callers to do a NULL check if (pool) dma_pool_destroy(pool); Or, otherwise, be invalid dma_pool_destroy() users. Tweak dma_pool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there. Proposed by Andrew Morton. Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/dmapool.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff -puN mm/dmapool.c~mm-dmapool-allow-null-pool-pointer-in-dma_pool_destroy mm/dmapool.c --- a/mm/dmapool.c~mm-dmapool-allow-null-pool-pointer-in-dma_pool_destroy +++ a/mm/dmapool.c @@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ void dma_pool_destroy(struct dma_pool *p { bool empty = false; + if (unlikely(!pool)) + return; + mutex_lock(&pools_reg_lock); mutex_lock(&pools_lock); list_del(&pool->pools); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx are -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html