The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2/dlm: use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
ocfs2-dlm-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2/dlm: use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each
Use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c~ocfs2-dlm-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c~ocfs2-dlm-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ static int dlm_process_recovery_data(str
struct dlm_migratable_lockres *mres)
{
struct dlm_migratable_lock *ml;
- struct list_head *queue, *iter;
+ struct list_head *queue;
struct list_head *tmpq = NULL;
struct dlm_lock *newlock = NULL;
struct dlm_lockstatus *lksb = NULL;
@@ -1821,9 +1821,7 @@ static int dlm_process_recovery_data(str
spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
for (j = DLM_GRANTED_LIST; j <= DLM_BLOCKED_LIST; j++) {
tmpq = dlm_list_idx_to_ptr(res, j);
- list_for_each(iter, tmpq) {
- lock = list_entry(iter,
- struct dlm_lock, list);
+ list_for_each_entry(lock, tmpq, list) {
if (lock->ml.cookie == ml->cookie)
break;
lock = NULL;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
