The patch titled
Subject: mm: cma: mark cma_bitmap_maxno() inline in header
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-cma-mark-cma_bitmap_maxno-inline-in-header.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: cma: mark cma_bitmap_maxno() inline in header
cma_bitmap_maxno() was marked as static and not static inline, which can
cause warnings about this function not being used if this file is included
in a file that does not call that function, and violates the conventions
used elsewhere. The two options are to move the function implementation
back to mm/cma.c or make it inline here, and it's simple enough for the
latter to make sense.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/cma.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN mm/cma.h~mm-cma-mark-cma_bitmap_maxno-inline-in-header mm/cma.h
--- a/mm/cma.h~mm-cma-mark-cma_bitmap_maxno-inline-in-header
+++ a/mm/cma.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct cma {
extern struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS];
extern unsigned cma_area_count;
-static unsigned long cma_bitmap_maxno(struct cma *cma)
+static inline unsigned long cma_bitmap_maxno(struct cma *cma)
{
return cma->count >> cma->order_per_bit;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
