The patch titled Subject: signalfd: fix information leak in signalfd_copyinfo has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was signalfd-fix-information-leak-in-signalfd_copyinfo.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: "Amanieu d'Antras" <amanieu@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: signalfd: fix information leak in signalfd_copyinfo This function may copy the si_addr_lsb field to user mode when it hasn't been initialized, which can leak kernel stack data to user mode. Just checking the value of si_code is insufficient because the same si_code value is shared between multiple signals. This is solved by checking the value of si_signo in addition to si_code. Signed-off-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/signalfd.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/signalfd.c~signalfd-fix-information-leak-in-signalfd_copyinfo fs/signalfd.c --- a/fs/signalfd.c~signalfd-fix-information-leak-in-signalfd_copyinfo +++ a/fs/signalfd.c @@ -121,8 +121,9 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct sign * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field, * so check explicitly for the right codes here. */ - if (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || - kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO) + if (kinfo->si_signo == SIGBUS && + (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || + kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) err |= __put_user((short) kinfo->si_addr_lsb, &uinfo->ssi_addr_lsb); #endif _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from amanieu@xxxxxxxxx are origin.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html