+ mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/cma.c: fix typos in comments
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/cma.c: fix typos in comments

Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/cma.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/cma.c~mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments mm/cma.c
--- a/mm/cma.c~mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments
+++ a/mm/cma.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_ad
 	if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
+	/* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
 	alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);
 
 	/* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_a
 	/*
 	 * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
 	 * address isn't appropriate.  But it would be useful to check the
-	 * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
+	 * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
 	 * the physical address from it.  On x86 there is a validation check for
 	 * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
 	 */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-cma-fix-for-typos-in-comments.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux