+ zram-close-race-by-open-overriding.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: zram: close race by open overriding
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     zram-close-race-by-open-overriding.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/zram-close-race-by-open-overriding.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/zram-close-race-by-open-overriding.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: zram: close race by open overriding


ba6b17d68c8e3aa8d ("zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition")
introduced bdev->bd_mutex to protect a race between mount and reset.  At
that time, we don't have dynamic zram-add/remove feature so it was okay.

However, as we introduce dynamic device feature, bd_mutex became
trouble.

	CPU 0

echo 1 > /sys/block/zram<id>/reset
  -> kernfs->s_active(A)
    -> zram:reset_store->bd_mutex(B)

	CPU 1

echo <id> > /sys/class/zram/zram-remove
  ->zram:zram_remove: bd_mutex(B)
  -> sysfs_remove_group
    -> kernfs->s_active(A)

IOW, AB -> BA deadlock

The reason we are holding bd_mutex for zram_remove is to prevent
any incoming open /dev/zram[0-9]. Otherwise, we could remove zram
others already have opened. But it causes above deadlock problem.

To fix the problem, this patch overrides block_device.open and
it returns -EBUSY if zram asserts he claims zram to reset so any
incoming open will be failed so we don't need to hold bd_mutex
for zram_remove ayn more.

This patch is to prepare for zram-add/remove feature.

[sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx: simplify reset_store()]
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |    4 ++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-close-race-by-open-overriding drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-close-race-by-open-overriding
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1068,45 +1068,60 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device
 	struct zram *zram;
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 
+	ret = kstrtou16(buf, 10, &do_reset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!do_reset)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
 	bdev = bdget_disk(zram->disk, 0);
-
 	if (!bdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
-	/* Do not reset an active device! */
-	if (bdev->bd_openers) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
+	/* Do not reset an active device or claimed device */
+	if (bdev->bd_openers || zram->claim) {
+		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+		bdput(bdev);
+		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	ret = kstrtou16(buf, 10, &do_reset);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-
-	if (!do_reset) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	/* From now on, anyone can't open /dev/zram[0-9] */
+	zram->claim = true;
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 
-	/* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */
+	/* Make sure all the pending I/O are finished */
 	fsync_bdev(bdev);
 	zram_reset_device(zram);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 	revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
 	bdput(bdev);
 
+	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	zram->claim = false;
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+
 	return len;
+}
+
+static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct zram *zram;
+
+	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&bdev->bd_mutex));
+
+	zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+	/* zram was claimed to reset so open request fails */
+	if (zram->claim)
+		ret = -EBUSY;
 
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
-	bdput(bdev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = {
+	.open = zram_open,
 	.swap_slot_free_notify = zram_slot_free_notify,
 	.rw_page = zram_rw_page,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE
diff -puN drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h~zram-close-race-by-open-overriding drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h~zram-close-race-by-open-overriding
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -115,5 +115,9 @@ struct zram {
 	 */
 	u64 disksize;	/* bytes */
 	char compressor[10];
+	/*
+	 * zram is claimed so open request will be failed
+	 */
+	bool claim; /* Protected by bdev->bd_mutex */
 };
 #endif
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx are

zram-add-compact-sysfs-entry-to-documentation.patch
zram-cosmetic-zram_attr_ro-code-formatting-tweak.patch
zram-use-idr-instead-of-zram_devices-array.patch
zram-reorganize-code-layout.patch
zram-remove-max_num_devices-limitation.patch
zram-report-every-added-and-removed-device.patch
zram-trivial-correct-flag-operations-comment.patch
zram-return-zram-device_id-from-zram_add.patch
zram-close-race-by-open-overriding.patch
zram-add-dynamic-device-add-remove-functionality.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux