[merged] rtc-armada38x-fix-concurrency-access-in-armada38x_rtc_set_time.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: rtc: armada38x: fix concurrency access in armada38x_rtc_set_time
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     rtc-armada38x-fix-concurrency-access-in-armada38x_rtc_set_time.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: rtc: armada38x: fix concurrency access in armada38x_rtc_set_time

While setting the time, the RTC TIME register should not be accessed. 
However due to hardware constraints, setting the RTC time involves
sleeping during 100ms.  This sleep was done outside the critical section
protected by the spinlock, so it was possible to read the RTC TIME
register and get an incorrect value.  This patch introduces a mutex for
protecting the RTC TIME access, unlike the spinlock it is allowed to sleep
in a critical section protected by a mutex.  The RTC STATUS register can
still be used from the interrupt handler but it has no effect on setting
the time.

Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	[4.0]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c~rtc-armada38x-fix-concurrency-access-in-armada38x_rtc_set_time drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c~rtc-armada38x-fix-concurrency-access-in-armada38x_rtc_set_time
+++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ struct armada38x_rtc {
 	void __iomem	    *regs;
 	void __iomem	    *regs_soc;
 	spinlock_t	    lock;
+	/*
+	 * While setting the time, the RTC TIME register should not be
+	 * accessed. Setting the RTC time involves sleeping during
+	 * 100ms, so a mutex instead of a spinlock is used to protect
+	 * it
+	 */
+	struct mutex	    mutex_time;
 	int		    irq;
 };
 
@@ -59,8 +66,7 @@ static int armada38x_rtc_read_time(struc
 	struct armada38x_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	unsigned long time, time_check, flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
-
+	mutex_lock(&rtc->mutex_time);
 	time = readl(rtc->regs + RTC_TIME);
 	/*
 	 * WA for failing time set attempts. As stated in HW ERRATA if
@@ -71,7 +77,7 @@ static int armada38x_rtc_read_time(struc
 	if ((time_check - time) > 1)
 		time_check = readl(rtc->regs + RTC_TIME);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&rtc->mutex_time);
 
 	rtc_time_to_tm(time_check, tm);
 
@@ -94,19 +100,12 @@ static int armada38x_rtc_set_time(struct
 	 * then wait for 100ms before writing to the time register to be
 	 * sure that the data will be taken into account.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
-
+	mutex_lock(&rtc->mutex_time);
 	rtc_delayed_write(0, rtc, RTC_STATUS);
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->lock, flags);
-
 	msleep(100);
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
-
 	rtc_delayed_write(time, rtc, RTC_TIME);
+	mutex_unlock(&rtc->mutex_time);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->lock, flags);
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -230,6 +229,7 @@ static __init int armada38x_rtc_probe(st
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&rtc->lock);
+	mutex_init(&rtc->mutex_time);
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "rtc");
 	rtc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux