[merged] signal-remove-warning-about-using-si_tkill-in-rt_sigqueueinfo.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: signal: remove warning about using SI_TKILL in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     signal-remove-warning-about-using-si_tkill-in-rt_sigqueueinfo.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: signal: remove warning about using SI_TKILL in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo

Sending SI_TKILL from rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo was deprecated, so now we issue
a warning on the first attempt of doing it.  We use WARN_ON_ONCE, which is
not informative and, what is worse, taints the kernel, making the trinity
syscall fuzzer complain false-positively from time to time.

It does not look like we need this warning at all, because the behaviour
changed quite a long time ago (2.6.39), and if an application relies on
the old API, it gets EPERM anyway and can issue a warning by itself.

So let us zap the warning in kernel.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/signal.c~signal-remove-warning-about-using-si_tkill-in-rt_sigqueueinfo kernel/signal.c
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-remove-warning-about-using-si_tkill-in-rt_sigqueueinfo
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2992,11 +2992,9 @@ static int do_rt_sigqueueinfo(pid_t pid,
 	 * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
 	 */
 	if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
-	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid)) {
-		/* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(info->si_code < 0);
+	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
 		return -EPERM;
-	}
+
 	info->si_signo = sig;
 
 	/* POSIX.1b doesn't mention process groups.  */
@@ -3041,12 +3039,10 @@ static int do_rt_tgsigqueueinfo(pid_t tg
 	/* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel.
 	 * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
 	 */
-	if (((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL)) &&
-	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid)) {
-		/* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(info->si_code < 0);
+	if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
+	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
 		return -EPERM;
-	}
+
 	info->si_signo = sig;
 
 	return do_send_specific(tgid, pid, sig, info);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
mm-vmscan-fix-the-page-state-calculation-in-too_many_isolated.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux