The patch titled
Subject: memcg: remove obsolete comment
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memcg-remove-obsolete-comment.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcg: remove obsolete comment
Low and high watermarks, as they defined in the TODO to the mem_cgroup
struct, have already been implemented by Johannes, so remove the stale
comment.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-remove-obsolete-comment mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-remove-obsolete-comment
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -259,11 +259,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_oom_notify(struct
* page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
* statistics based on the statistics developed by Rik Van Riel for clock-pro,
* to help the administrator determine what knobs to tune.
- *
- * TODO: Add a water mark for the memory controller. Reclaim will begin when
- * we hit the water mark. May be even add a low water mark, such that
- * no reclaim occurs from a cgroup at it's low water mark, this is
- * a feature that will be implemented much later in the future.
*/
struct mem_cgroup {
struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
mm-vmscan-fix-the-page-state-calculation-in-too_many_isolated.patch
signal-remove-warning-about-using-si_tkill-in-rt_sigqueueinfo.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
