The patch titled
Subject: nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode-fix
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode-fix.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode.patch
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode-fix
I've got a warning from 0day kernel testing backend:
fs/nilfs2/btree.c: In function 'nilfs_btree_root_broken':
>> fs/nilfs2/btree.c:394:3: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'ino_t' [-Wformat=]
pr_crit("NILFS: bad btree root (inode number=%lu): level = %d,
flags = 0x%x, nchildren = %d\n",
^
This is output for s390 arch since ino_t doesn't mean "unsigned long"
in s390.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nilfs2/btree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/nilfs2/btree.c~nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode-fix fs/nilfs2/btree.c
--- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c~nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode-fix
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int nilfs_btree_node_broken(const
* Return Value: If node is broken, 1 is returned. Otherwise, 0 is returned.
*/
static int nilfs_btree_root_broken(const struct nilfs_btree_node *node,
- ino_t ino)
+ unsigned long ino)
{
int level, flags, nchildren;
int ret = 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
nilfs2-fix-potential-memory-overrun-on-inode.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
