[merged] fs-make-shrinker-memcg-aware.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: fs: make shrinker memcg aware
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     fs-make-shrinker-memcg-aware.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs: make shrinker memcg aware

Now, to make any list_lru-based shrinker memcg aware we should only
initialize its list_lru as memcg aware.  Let's do it for the general FS
shrinker (super_block::s_shrink).

There are other FS-specific shrinkers that use list_lru for storing
objects, such as XFS and GFS2 dquot cache shrinkers, but since they
reclaim objects that are shared among different cgroups, there is no point
making them memcg aware.  It's a big question whether we should account
them to memcg at all.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/super.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/super.c~fs-make-shrinker-memcg-aware fs/super.c
--- a/fs/super.c~fs-make-shrinker-memcg-aware
+++ a/fs/super.c
@@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(s
 	INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(&s->s_anon);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_inodes);
 
-	if (list_lru_init(&s->s_dentry_lru))
+	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_dentry_lru))
 		goto fail;
-	if (list_lru_init(&s->s_inode_lru))
+	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_inode_lru))
 		goto fail;
 
 	init_rwsem(&s->s_umount);
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(s
 	s->s_shrink.scan_objects = super_cache_scan;
 	s->s_shrink.count_objects = super_cache_count;
 	s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
-	s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
+	s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
 	return s;
 
 fail:
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
mm-vmscan-fix-the-page-state-calculation-in-too_many_isolated.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux