The patch titled Subject: zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition Ganesh Mahendran was the first one who proposed to use bdev->bd_mutex to avoid ->bd_holders race condition: CPU0 CPU1 umount /* zram->init_done is true */ reset_store() bdev->bd_holders == 0 mount ... zram_make_request() zram_reset_device() However, his solution required some considerable amount of code movement, which we can avoid. Apart from using bdev->bd_mutex in reset_store(), this patch also simplifies zram_reset_device(). zram_reset_device() has a bool parameter reset_capacity which tells it whether disk capacity and itself disk should be reset. There are two zram_reset_device() callers: -- zram_exit() passes reset_capacity=false -- reset_store() passes reset_capacity=true So we can move reset_capacity-sensitive work out of zram_reset_device() and perform it unconditionally in reset_store(). This also lets us drop reset_capacity parameter from zram_reset_device() and pass zram pointer only. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff -puN drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition +++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram } } -static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram, bool reset_capacity) +static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram) { down_write(&zram->init_lock); @@ -734,18 +734,7 @@ static void zram_reset_device(struct zra memset(&zram->stats, 0, sizeof(zram->stats)); zram->disksize = 0; - if (reset_capacity) - set_capacity(zram->disk, 0); - up_write(&zram->init_lock); - - /* - * Revalidate disk out of the init_lock to avoid lockdep splat. - * It's okay because disk's capacity is protected by init_lock - * so that revalidate_disk always sees up-to-date capacity. - */ - if (reset_capacity) - revalidate_disk(zram->disk); } static ssize_t disksize_store(struct device *dev, @@ -818,6 +807,7 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device if (!bdev) return -ENOMEM; + mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); /* Do not reset an active device! */ if (bdev->bd_holders) { ret = -EBUSY; @@ -835,12 +825,17 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device /* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */ fsync_bdev(bdev); + zram_reset_device(zram); + set_capacity(zram->disk, 0); + + mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex); + revalidate_disk(zram->disk); bdput(bdev); - zram_reset_device(zram, true); return len; out: + mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex); bdput(bdev); return ret; } @@ -1186,7 +1181,7 @@ static void __exit zram_exit(void) * Shouldn't access zram->disk after destroy_device * because destroy_device already released zram->disk. */ - zram_reset_device(zram, false); + zram_reset_device(zram); } unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram"); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx are zram-clean-up-zram_meta_alloc.patch zram-free-meta-table-in-zram_meta_free.patch zram-fix-umount-reset_store-mount-race-condition.patch linux-next.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html