The patch titled
Subject: Re: vmscan: per memory cgroup slab shrinkers
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
vmscan-per-memory-cgroup-slab-shrinkers-fix.patch
This patch was dropped because it was withdrawn
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: vmscan: per memory cgroup slab shrinkers
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:33:46PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Looks sc->nr_reclaimed has to be updated for "limit reclaim".
>
That's true, thank you for catching this!
I think we should move reclaim_state handling to shrink_slab(), as this
incremental patch does:
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-per-memory-cgroup-slab-shrinkers-fix mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-per-memory-cgroup-slab-shrinkers-fix
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(stru
* @memcg: memory cgroup whose slab caches to target
* @nr_scanned: pressure numerator
* @nr_eligible: pressure denominator
+ * @nr_reclaimed: number of reclaimed slab pages
*
* Call the shrink functions to age shrinkable caches.
*
@@ -372,8 +373,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(stru
static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long nr_scanned,
- unsigned long nr_eligible)
+ unsigned long nr_eligible,
+ unsigned long *nr_reclaimed)
{
+ struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
struct shrinker *shrinker;
unsigned long freed = 0;
@@ -394,6 +397,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t g
goto out;
}
+ if (reclaim_state)
+ reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
+
list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
@@ -410,6 +416,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t g
freed += do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
}
+ if (reclaim_state)
+ *nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
+
up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
out:
cond_resched();
@@ -419,6 +428,7 @@ out:
void drop_slab_node(int nid)
{
unsigned long freed;
+ unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
do {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
@@ -426,7 +436,7 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
freed = 0;
do {
freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
- 1000, 1000);
+ 1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
} while (freed > 10);
}
@@ -2307,7 +2317,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_recla
static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
bool is_classzone)
{
- struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
bool reclaimable = false;
@@ -2339,7 +2348,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zon
if (memcg && is_classzone)
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
- lru_pages);
+ lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
/*
* Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
@@ -2366,12 +2375,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zon
if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
- zone_lru_pages);
-
- if (reclaim_state) {
- sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
- reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
- }
+ zone_lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
@@ -3335,10 +3339,7 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
int balanced_classzone_idx;
pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t*)p;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-
- struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
- .reclaimed_slab = 0,
- };
+ struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3476,7 +3477,6 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
- reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
@@ -3665,7 +3665,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *z
*/
p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
- reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
if (zone_pagecache_reclaimable(zone) > zone->min_unmapped_pages) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
memcg-zap-__memcg_chargeuncharge_slab.patch
memcg-zap-memcg_name-argument-of-memcg_create_kmem_cache.patch
memcg-zap-memcg_slab_caches-and-memcg_slab_mutex.patch
swap-remove-unused-mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache-declaration.patch
mm-memcontrol-track-move_lock-state-internally.patch
mm-vmscan-wake-up-all-pfmemalloc-throttled-processes-at-once.patch
list_lru-introduce-list_lru_shrink_countwalk.patch
fs-consolidate-nrfree_cached_objects-args-in-shrink_control.patch
vmscan-per-memory-cgroup-slab-shrinkers.patch
memcg-rename-some-cache-id-related-variables.patch
memcg-add-rwsem-to-synchronize-against-memcg_caches-arrays-relocation.patch
list_lru-get-rid-of-active_nodes.patch
list_lru-organize-all-list_lrus-to-list.patch
list_lru-introduce-per-memcg-lists.patch
fs-make-shrinker-memcg-aware.patch
vmscan-force-scan-offline-memory-cgroups.patch
mm-page_counter-pull-1-handling-out-of-page_counter_memparse.patch
mm-memcontrol-default-hierarchy-interface-for-memory.patch
mm-memcontrol-remove-unnecessary-soft-limit-tree-node-test.patch
mm-memcontrol-consolidate-memory-controller-initialization.patch
mm-memcontrol-consolidate-swap-controller-code.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
