+ ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: ocfs2: do not fall back to buffer I/O write if appending
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: WeiWei Wang <wangww631@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: do not fall back to buffer I/O write if appending

After enabling block allocation in direct-io write, we don't fall back to
buffer I/O write in append write situation any more.  If the O_DIRECT flag
is taken, we use direct-io.

Signed-off-by: Weiwei Wang <wangww631@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/ocfs2/aops.c |    4 ----
 fs/ocfs2/file.c |   11 -----------
 2 files changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/ocfs2/aops.c~ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending fs/ocfs2/aops.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c~ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -663,10 +663,6 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_direct_IO(int rw,
 	if (OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* Fallback to buffered I/O if we are appending. */
-	if (i_size_read(inode) <= offset)
-		return 0;
-
 	if (rw == WRITE) {
 		loff_t final_size = offset + count;
 		/*
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending fs/ocfs2/file.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -2189,17 +2189,6 @@ static int ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * Allowing concurrent direct writes means
-		 * i_size changes wouldn't be synchronized, so
-		 * one node could wind up truncating another
-		 * nodes writes.
-		 */
-		if (end > i_size_read(inode)) {
-			*direct_io = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
 		 * We don't fill holes during direct io, so
 		 * check for them here. If any are found, the
 		 * caller will have to retake some cluster
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from wangww631@xxxxxxxxxx are

ocfs2-eliminate-the-static-flag-of-some-functions.patch
ocfs2-add-two-functions-of-add-and-remove-inode-in-orphan-dir.patch
ocfs2-add-orphan-recovery-types-in-ocfs2_recover_orphans.patch
ocfs2-add-and-remove-inode-in-orphan-dir-in-ocfs2_direct_io.patch
ocfs2-allocate-blocks-in-ocfs2_direct_io_get_blocks.patch
ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-appending.patch
ocfs2-do-not-fallback-to-buffer-i-o-write-if-fill-holes.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux