[merged] mm-memcontrol-clean-up-reclaim-size-variable-use-in-try_charge.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: memcontrol: clean up reclaim size variable use in try_charge()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memcontrol-clean-up-reclaim-size-variable-use-in-try_charge.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: clean up reclaim size variable use in try_charge()

Charge reclaim and OOM currently use the charge batch variable, but
batching is already disabled at that point.  To simplify the charge logic,
the batch variable is reset to the original request size when reclaim is
entered, so it's functionally equal, but it's misleading.

Switch reclaim/OOM to nr_pages, which is the original request size.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-clean-up-reclaim-size-variable-use-in-try_charge mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-clean-up-reclaim-size-variable-use-in-try_charge
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ retry:
 
 	nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= batch)
+	if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
 		goto retry;
 
 	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ retry:
 	 * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
 	 * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
 	 */
-	if (nr_reclaimed && batch <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
+	if (nr_reclaimed && nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
 		goto retry;
 	/*
 	 * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
@@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ retry:
 	if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
 		goto bypass;
 
-	mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch));
+	mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
 nomem:
 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
 		return -ENOMEM;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
mm-memcontrol-rewrite-charge-api.patch
mm-memcontrol-rewrite-uncharge-api.patch
mm-memcontrol-use-page-lists-for-uncharge-batching.patch
mm-memcontrol-use-page-lists-for-uncharge-batching-fix-hugetlb-page-lru.patch
page-cgroup-trivial-cleanup.patch
page-cgroup-get-rid-of-nr_pcg_flags.patch
memcg-remove-lookup_cgroup_page-prototype.patch
mm-memcontrol-avoid-charge-statistics-churn-during-page-migration.patch
nilfs2-integrate-sysfs-support-into-driver-fix.patch
linux-next.patch
debugging-keep-track-of-page-owners.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux