[merged] slab-destroy-a-slab-without-holding-any-alien-cache-lock.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: slab: destroy a slab without holding any alien cache lock
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     slab-destroy-a-slab-without-holding-any-alien-cache-lock.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Subject: slab: destroy a slab without holding any alien cache lock

I haven't heard that this alien cache lock is contended, but to reduce
chance of contention would be better generally.  And with this change, we
can simplify complex lockdep annotation in slab code.  In the following
patch, it will be implemented.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/slab.c |   20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/slab.c~slab-destroy-a-slab-without-holding-any-alien-cache-lock mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c~slab-destroy-a-slab-without-holding-any-alien-cache-lock
+++ a/mm/slab.c
@@ -1050,10 +1050,10 @@ static void free_alien_cache(struct alie
 }
 
 static void __drain_alien_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
-				struct array_cache *ac, int node)
+				struct array_cache *ac, int node,
+				struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(cachep, node);
-	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
 	if (ac->avail) {
 		spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
@@ -1065,10 +1065,9 @@ static void __drain_alien_cache(struct k
 		if (n->shared)
 			transfer_objects(n->shared, ac, ac->limit);
 
-		free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail, node, &list);
+		free_block(cachep, ac->entry, ac->avail, node, list);
 		ac->avail = 0;
 		spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
-		slabs_destroy(cachep, &list);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1086,8 +1085,11 @@ static void reap_alien(struct kmem_cache
 		if (alc) {
 			ac = &alc->ac;
 			if (ac->avail && spin_trylock_irq(&alc->lock)) {
-				__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, node);
+				LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+				__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, node, &list);
 				spin_unlock_irq(&alc->lock);
+				slabs_destroy(cachep, &list);
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -1104,10 +1106,13 @@ static void drain_alien_cache(struct kme
 	for_each_online_node(i) {
 		alc = alien[i];
 		if (alc) {
+			LIST_HEAD(list);
+
 			ac = &alc->ac;
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&alc->lock, flags);
-			__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, i);
+			__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, i, &list);
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&alc->lock, flags);
+			slabs_destroy(cachep, &list);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1138,10 +1143,11 @@ static inline int cache_free_alien(struc
 		spin_lock(&alien->lock);
 		if (unlikely(ac->avail == ac->limit)) {
 			STATS_INC_ACOVERFLOW(cachep);
-			__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, nodeid);
+			__drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, nodeid, &list);
 		}
 		ac_put_obj(cachep, ac, objp);
 		spin_unlock(&alien->lock);
+		slabs_destroy(cachep, &list);
 	} else {
 		n = get_node(cachep, nodeid);
 		spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx are

origin.patch
mm-compactionc-isolate_freepages_block-small-tuneup.patch
page-owners-correct-page-order-when-to-free-page.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux