The patch titled Subject: memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix.patch This patch was dropped because it was withdrawn ------------------------------------------------------ From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Subject: memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible -> mem_cgroup_within_guarantee follow_low_limit -> honor_memcg_guarantee and as suggested by Johannes. Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 +++--- mm/memcontrol.c | 15 ++++++++------- mm/vmscan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix include/linux/memcontrol.h --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix +++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ bool __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg); -extern bool mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, +extern bool mem_cgroup_within_guarantee(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *root); extern struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page); @@ -291,10 +291,10 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_ return &zone->lruvec; } -static inline bool mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, +static inline bool mem_cgroup_within_guarantee(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *root) { - return true; + return false; } static inline struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page) diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix mm/memcontrol.c --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2780,26 +2780,27 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_loo } /** - * mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible - checks whether given memcg is eligible for the - * reclaim + * mem_cgroup_within_guarantee - checks whether given memcg is within its + * memory guarantee * @memcg: target memcg for the reclaim * @root: root of the reclaim hierarchy (null for the global reclaim) * - * The given group is reclaimable if it is above its low limit and the same - * applies for all parents up the hierarchy until root (including). + * The given group is within its reclaim gurantee if it is below its low limit + * or the same applies for any parent up the hierarchy until root (including). + * Such a group might be excluded from the reclaim. */ -bool mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, +bool mem_cgroup_within_guarantee(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *root) { do { if (!res_counter_low_limit_excess(&memcg->res)) - return false; + return true; if (memcg == root) break; } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))); - return true; + return false; } struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page) diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix mm/vmscan.c --- a/mm/vmscan.c~memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix +++ a/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2231,8 +2231,18 @@ static inline bool should_continue_recla } } +/** + * __shrink_zone - shrinks a given zone + * + * @zone: zone to shrink + * @sc: scan control with additional reclaim parameters + * @honor_memcg_guarantee: do not reclaim memcgs which are within their memory + * guarantee + * + * Returns the number of reclaimed memcgs. + */ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, - bool follow_low_limit) + bool honor_memcg_guarantee) { unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned; unsigned nr_scanned_groups = 0; @@ -2252,12 +2262,9 @@ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zon do { struct lruvec *lruvec; - /* - * Memcg might be under its low limit so we have to - * skip it during the first reclaim round - */ - if (follow_low_limit && - !mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(memcg, root)) { + /* Memcg might be protected from the reclaim */ + if (honor_memcg_guarantee && + mem_cgroup_within_guarantee(memcg, root)) { /* * It would be more optimal to skip the memcg * subtree now but we do not have a memcg iter @@ -2306,8 +2313,8 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zon if (!__shrink_zone(zone, sc, true)) { /* * First round of reclaim didn't find anything to reclaim - * because of low limit protection so try again and ignore - * the low limit this time. + * because of the memory guantees for all memcgs in the + * reclaim target so try again and ignore guarantees this time. */ __shrink_zone(zone, sc, false); } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxx are mm-vmscanc-avoid-recording-the-original-scan-targets-in-shrink_lruvec.patch pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core.patch pagewalk-add-walk_page_vma.patch smaps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch clear_refs-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch pagemap-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch numa_maps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch memcg-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch arch-powerpc-mm-subpage-protc-use-walk_page_vma-instead-of-walk_page_range.patch pagewalk-remove-argument-hmask-from-hugetlb_entry.patch mempolicy-apply-page-table-walker-on-queue_pages_range.patch mm-pagewalk-remove-pgd_entry-and-pud_entry.patch mm-pagewalk-replace-mm_walk-skip-with-more-general-mm_walk-control.patch madvise-cleanup-swapin_walk_pmd_entry.patch memcg-separate-mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range.patch arch-powerpc-mm-subpage-protc-cleanup-subpage_walk_pmd_entry.patch mm-pagewalk-move-pmd_trans_huge_lock-from-callbacks-to-common-code.patch mincore-apply-page-table-walker-on-do_mincore.patch memcg-allow-setting-low_limit.patch memcg-doc-clarify-global-vs-limit-reclaims.patch memcg-doc-clarify-global-vs-limit-reclaims-fix.patch memcg-document-memorylow_limit_in_bytes.patch vmscan-memcg-check-whether-the-low-limit-should-be-ignored.patch memcg-deprecate-memoryforce_empty-knob.patch memcg-deprecate-memoryforce_empty-knob-fix.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html