Subject: [merged] mm-memcontrol-remove-unnecessary-memcg-argument-from-soft-limit-functions.patch removed from -mm tree
To: hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx,mhocko@xxxxxxx,nasa4836@xxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:40:56 -0700
The patch titled
Subject: mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary memcg argument from soft limit functions
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memcontrol-remove-unnecessary-memcg-argument-from-soft-limit-functions.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary memcg argument from soft limit functions
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-remove-unnecessary-memcg-argument-from-soft-limit-functions mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-remove-unnecessary-memcg-argument-from-soft-limit-functions
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -713,11 +713,9 @@ soft_limit_tree_from_page(struct page *p
return &soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid]->rb_tree_per_zone[zid];
}
-static void
-__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz,
- unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess)
+static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
+ struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz,
+ unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess)
{
struct rb_node **p = &mctz->rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
@@ -747,10 +745,8 @@ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_
mz->on_tree = true;
}
-static void
-__mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
+static void __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
+ struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
{
if (!mz->on_tree)
return;
@@ -758,13 +754,11 @@ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_
mz->on_tree = false;
}
-static void
-mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
+static void mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
+ struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
{
spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
+ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
}
@@ -791,12 +785,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struc
spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
/* if on-tree, remove it */
if (mz->on_tree)
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
+ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
/*
* Insert again. mz->usage_in_excess will be updated.
* If excess is 0, no tree ops.
*/
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz, excess);
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz, mctz, excess);
spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
}
}
@@ -812,7 +806,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees
for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
mz = &memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->zoneinfo[zid];
mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(nid, zid);
- mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
+ mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
}
}
}
@@ -835,7 +829,7 @@ retry:
* we will to add it back at the end of reclaim to its correct
* position in the tree.
*/
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz->memcg, mz, mctz);
+ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
if (!res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->memcg->res) ||
!css_tryget(&mz->memcg->css))
goto retry;
@@ -4586,7 +4580,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
break;
} while (1);
}
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz->memcg, mz, mctz);
+ __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->memcg->res);
/*
* One school of thought says that we should not add
@@ -4597,7 +4591,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
* term TODO.
*/
/* If excess == 0, no tree ops */
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz->memcg, mz, mctz, excess);
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz, mctz, excess);
spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
css_put(&mz->memcg->css);
loop++;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core.patch
pagewalk-add-walk_page_vma.patch
smaps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch
clear_refs-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch
pagemap-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch
numa_maps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch
memcg-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch
arch-powerpc-mm-subpage-protc-use-walk_page_vma-instead-of-walk_page_range.patch
pagewalk-remove-argument-hmask-from-hugetlb_entry.patch
mempolicy-apply-page-table-walker-on-queue_pages_range.patch
linux-next.patch
memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim.patch
memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix.patch
memcg-mm-introduce-lowlimit-reclaim-fix2patch.patch
memcg-allow-setting-low_limit.patch
memcg-doc-clarify-global-vs-limit-reclaims.patch
memcg-doc-clarify-global-vs-limit-reclaims-fix.patch
memcg-document-memorylow_limit_in_bytes.patch
vmscan-memcg-check-whether-the-low-limit-should-be-ignored.patch
memcg-deprecate-memoryforce_empty-knob.patch
memcg-deprecate-memoryforce_empty-knob-fix.patch
debugging-keep-track-of-page-owners.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
