Subject: [merged] ocfs2-update-inode-size-after-zeronig-the-hole.patch removed from -mm tree To: junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx,jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx,mfasheh@xxxxxxx,younger.liu@xxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:23:52 -0800 The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: update inode size after zeroing the hole has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-update-inode-size-after-zeronig-the-hole.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: ocfs2: update inode size after zeroing the hole fs-writeback will release the dirty pages without page lock whose offset are over inode size, the release happens at block_write_full_page_endio(). If not update, dirty pages in file holes may be released before flushed to the disk, then file holes will contain some non-zero data, this will cause sparse file md5sum error. To reproduce the bug, find a big sparse file with many holes, like vm image file, its actual size should be bigger than available mem size to make writeback work more frequently, tar it with -S option, then keep untar it and check its md5sum again and again until you get a wrong md5sum. Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Younger Liu <younger.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxx> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-update-inode-size-after-zeronig-the-hole fs/ocfs2/file.c --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-update-inode-size-after-zeronig-the-hole +++ a/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -716,7 +716,8 @@ leave: * While a write will already be ordering the data, a truncate will not. * Thus, we need to explicitly order the zeroed pages. */ -static handle_t *ocfs2_zero_start_ordered_transaction(struct inode *inode) +static handle_t *ocfs2_zero_start_ordered_transaction(struct inode *inode, + struct buffer_head *di_bh) { struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); handle_t *handle = NULL; @@ -733,7 +734,14 @@ static handle_t *ocfs2_zero_start_ordere } ret = ocfs2_jbd2_file_inode(handle, inode); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + mlog_errno(ret); + goto out; + } + + ret = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh, + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); + if (ret) mlog_errno(ret); out: @@ -749,7 +757,7 @@ out: * to be too fragile to do exactly what we need without us having to * worry about recursive locking in ->write_begin() and ->write_end(). */ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct inode *inode, u64 abs_from, - u64 abs_to) + u64 abs_to, struct buffer_head *di_bh) { struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping; struct page *page; @@ -757,6 +765,7 @@ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct handle_t *handle = NULL; int ret = 0; unsigned zero_from, zero_to, block_start, block_end; + struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data; BUG_ON(abs_from >= abs_to); BUG_ON(abs_to > (((u64)index + 1) << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)); @@ -799,7 +808,8 @@ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct } if (!handle) { - handle = ocfs2_zero_start_ordered_transaction(inode); + handle = ocfs2_zero_start_ordered_transaction(inode, + di_bh); if (IS_ERR(handle)) { ret = PTR_ERR(handle); handle = NULL; @@ -816,8 +826,22 @@ static int ocfs2_write_zero_page(struct ret = 0; } - if (handle) + if (handle) { + /* + * fs-writeback will release the dirty pages without page lock + * whose offset are over inode size, the release happens at + * block_write_full_page_endio(). + */ + i_size_write(inode, abs_to); + inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode); + di->i_size = cpu_to_le64((u64)i_size_read(inode)); + inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; + di->i_mtime = di->i_ctime = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_mtime.tv_sec); + di->i_ctime_nsec = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec); + di->i_mtime_nsec = di->i_ctime_nsec; + ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, di_bh); ocfs2_commit_trans(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb), handle); + } out_unlock: unlock_page(page); @@ -913,7 +937,7 @@ out: * has made sure that the entire range needs zeroing. */ static int ocfs2_zero_extend_range(struct inode *inode, u64 range_start, - u64 range_end) + u64 range_end, struct buffer_head *di_bh) { int rc = 0; u64 next_pos; @@ -929,7 +953,7 @@ static int ocfs2_zero_extend_range(struc next_pos = (zero_pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK) + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; if (next_pos > range_end) next_pos = range_end; - rc = ocfs2_write_zero_page(inode, zero_pos, next_pos); + rc = ocfs2_write_zero_page(inode, zero_pos, next_pos, di_bh); if (rc < 0) { mlog_errno(rc); break; @@ -975,7 +999,7 @@ int ocfs2_zero_extend(struct inode *inod range_end = zero_to_size; ret = ocfs2_zero_extend_range(inode, range_start, - range_end); + range_end, di_bh); if (ret) { mlog_errno(ret); break; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html