[merged] ipcmsg-document-barriers.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: [merged] ipcmsg-document-barriers.patch removed from -mm tree
To: davidlohr@xxxxxx,aswin@xxxxxx,manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,riel@xxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:09:41 -0800


The patch titled
     Subject: ipc,msg: document barriers
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ipcmsg-document-barriers.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
Subject: ipc,msg: document barriers

Both expunge_all() and pipeline_send() rely on both a nil msg value and a
full barrier to guarantee the correct ordering when waking up a task. 
While its counter part at the receiving end is well documented for the
lockless recv algorithm, we still need to document these specific smp_mb()
calls.

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix typo, per Mike]
[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: mroe tpyos]
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@xxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 ipc/msg.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN ipc/msg.c~ipcmsg-document-barriers ipc/msg.c
--- a/ipc/msg.c~ipcmsg-document-barriers
+++ a/ipc/msg.c
@@ -253,8 +253,14 @@ static void expunge_all(struct msg_queue
 	struct msg_receiver *msr, *t;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(msr, t, &msq->q_receivers, r_list) {
-		msr->r_msg = NULL;
+		msr->r_msg = NULL; /* initialize expunge ordering */
 		wake_up_process(msr->r_tsk);
+		/*
+		 * Ensure that the wakeup is visible before setting r_msg as
+		 * the receiving end depends on it: either spinning on a nil,
+		 * or dealing with -EAGAIN cases. See lockless receive part 1
+		 * and 2 in do_msgrcv().
+		 */
 		smp_mb();
 		msr->r_msg = ERR_PTR(res);
 	}
@@ -638,15 +644,22 @@ static inline int pipelined_send(struct
 
 			list_del(&msr->r_list);
 			if (msr->r_maxsize < msg->m_ts) {
+				/* initialize pipelined send ordering */
 				msr->r_msg = NULL;
 				wake_up_process(msr->r_tsk);
-				smp_mb();
+				smp_mb(); /* see barrier comment below */
 				msr->r_msg = ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 			} else {
 				msr->r_msg = NULL;
 				msq->q_lrpid = task_pid_vnr(msr->r_tsk);
 				msq->q_rtime = get_seconds();
 				wake_up_process(msr->r_tsk);
+				/*
+				 * Ensure that the wakeup is visible before
+				 * setting r_msg, as the receiving end depends
+				 * on it. See lockless receive part 1 and 2 in
+				 * do_msgrcv().
+				 */
 				smp_mb();
 				msr->r_msg = msg;
 
@@ -654,6 +667,7 @@ static inline int pipelined_send(struct
 			}
 		}
 	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -716,6 +730,7 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, vo
 			goto out_unlock0;
 		}
 
+		/* enqueue the sender and prepare to block */
 		ss_add(msq, &s);
 
 		if (!ipc_rcu_getref(msq)) {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from davidlohr@xxxxxx are

origin.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux