+ memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: + memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch added to -mm tree
To: yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx,dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx,hpa@xxxxxxxxx,konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx,linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mingo@xxxxxxx,santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:55:41 -0800


The patch titled
     Subject: memblock: don't align size silent in memblock_virt_alloc()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memblock: don't align size silent in memblock_virt_alloc()

In original __alloc_memory_core_early() for bootmem wrapper, we do not
align size silently.

We should not do that, as later free with old size will leave some
range not freed.

It's obvious that code is copied from memblock_base_nid(), and that code
is wrong for the same reason.

Also remove that in memblock_alloc_base.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memblock.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memblock.c~memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc mm/memblock.c
--- a/mm/memblock.c~memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc
+++ a/mm/memblock.c
@@ -984,9 +984,6 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc
 	if (!align)
 		align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
 
-	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
-	size = round_up(size, align);
-
 	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid);
 	if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size))
 		return found;
@@ -1080,9 +1077,6 @@ static void * __init memblock_virt_alloc
 	if (!align)
 		align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
 
-	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
-	size = round_up(size, align);
-
 again:
 	alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr, max_addr,
 					    nid);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
memblock-nobootmem-add-memblock_virt_alloc_low.patch
x86-revert-wrong-memblock-current-limit-setting.patch
memblock-dont-align-size-silent-in-memblock_virt_alloc.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux