- task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled

     Task watchers: register semundo task watcher

has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename is

     task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher.patch

This patch was dropped because it was nacked by the maintainer

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Task watchers: register semundo task watcher
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>

This patch uses the task_watcher notifier chain to invoke exit_sem() at
appropriate times.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx>
DESC
make ipc/sem.c:exit_sem() static
EDESC

exit_sem() can now become static.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/sem.h |    5 -----
 ipc/sem.c           |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/exit.c       |    1 -
 kernel/fork.c       |    4 +---
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/sem.h~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher include/linux/sem.h
--- a/include/linux/sem.h~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher
+++ a/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ struct sysv_sem {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSVIPC
 
 extern int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk);
-extern void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
 
 #else
 static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -149,10 +148,6 @@ static inline int copy_semundo(unsigned 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return;
-}
 #endif
 
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
diff -puN ipc/sem.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher ipc/sem.c
--- a/ipc/sem.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher
+++ a/ipc/sem.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "util.h"
@@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ static struct ipc_ids sem_ids;
 
 static int newary (key_t, int, int);
 static void freeary (struct sem_array *sma, int id);
+static void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it);
 #endif
@@ -116,6 +118,27 @@ int sem_ctls[4] = {SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOP
 #define sc_semopm	(sem_ctls[2])
 #define sc_semmni	(sem_ctls[3])
 
+static int sem_undo_task_exit(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
+			      void *t)
+{
+	switch (get_watch_event(val)) {
+	/*
+	 * If it weren't for the fact that we need clone flags to call
+	 * it we could also implement the copy_semundo portion of
+	 * copy_process inside case WATCH_TASK_INIT
+	 */
+	case WATCH_TASK_FREE:
+		exit_sem(t);
+		return NOTIFY_OK;
+	default: /* Don't care */
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	}
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block sem_watch_tasks_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = sem_undo_task_exit
+};
+
 static int used_sems;
 
 void __init sem_init (void)
@@ -126,6 +149,7 @@ void __init sem_init (void)
 				"       key      semid perms      nsems   uid   gid  cuid  cgid      otime      ctime\n",
 				&sem_ids,
 				sysvipc_sem_proc_show);
+	register_task_watcher(&sem_watch_tasks_nb);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1263,7 +1287,7 @@ int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_fla
  * The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
  * and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
  */
-void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	struct sem_undo *u, **up;
diff -puN kernel/exit.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher kernel/exit.c
--- a/kernel/exit.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher
+++ a/kernel/exit.c
@@ -914,7 +914,6 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
 
 	if (group_dead)
 		acct_process();
-	exit_sem(tsk);
 	__exit_files(tsk);
 	__exit_fs(tsk);
 	exit_namespace(tsk);
diff -puN kernel/fork.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c~task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	if ((retval = copy_semundo(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_files(clone_flags, p)))
-		goto bad_fork_cleanup_semundo;
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_security;
 	if ((retval = copy_fs(clone_flags, p)))
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_files;
 	if ((retval = copy_sighand(clone_flags, p)))
@@ -1266,8 +1266,6 @@ bad_fork_cleanup_fs:
 	exit_fs(p); /* blocking */
 bad_fork_cleanup_files:
 	exit_files(p); /* blocking */
-bad_fork_cleanup_semundo:
-	exit_sem(p);
 bad_fork_cleanup_security:
 	security_task_free(p);
 	notify_result = notify_watchers(WATCH_TASK_FREE, p);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx are

kernel-bug-fixing-for-kernel-kmodc.patch
task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher.patch
task-watchers-register-per-task-semundo-watcher.patch
ipc-replace-kmalloc-and-memset-in-get_undo_list-with-kzalloc.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux