Subject: [merged] memcg-kmem-use-cache_from_memcg_idx-instead-of-hard-code.patch removed from -mm tree To: h.huangqiang@xxxxxxxxxx,glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx,mhocko@xxxxxxx,penberg@xxxxxxxxxx,rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:39:28 -0800 The patch titled Subject: memcg, kmem: use cache_from_memcg_idx instead of hard code has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was memcg-kmem-use-cache_from_memcg_idx-instead-of-hard-code.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: memcg, kmem: use cache_from_memcg_idx instead of hard code Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-kmem-use-cache_from_memcg_idx-instead-of-hard-code mm/memcontrol.c --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-kmem-use-cache_from_memcg_idx-instead-of-hard-code +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2956,7 +2956,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_params_t VM_BUG_ON(p->is_root_cache); cachep = p->root_cache; - return cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[memcg_cache_id(p->memcg)]; + return cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(p->memcg)); } #ifdef CONFIG_SLABINFO @@ -3393,7 +3393,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_k idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg); mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex); - new_cachep = cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx]; + new_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx); if (new_cachep) { css_put(&memcg->css); goto out; @@ -3439,8 +3439,8 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(s * we'll take the set_limit_mutex to protect ourselves against this. */ mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex); - for (i = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; i++) { - c = s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[i]; + for_each_memcg_cache_index(i) { + c = cache_from_memcg_idx(s, i); if (!c) continue; @@ -3573,8 +3573,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cach * code updating memcg_caches will issue a write barrier to match this. */ read_barrier_depends(); - if (likely(cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx])) { - cachep = cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx]; + if (likely(cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx))) { + cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx); goto out; } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from h.huangqiang@xxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html