On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 21:47:08 -0700
Rohit Seth <rohitseth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > diff -puN arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c~enable-oprofile-on-pentium-d arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> > --- a/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c~enable-oprofile-on-pentium-d
> > +++ a/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int __init p4_init(char ** cpu_ty
> > {
> > __u8 cpu_model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model;
> >
> > - if (cpu_model > 4)
> > + if ((cpu_model > 6) || (cpu_model == 5))
> > return 0;
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> > _
> >
> > Patches currently in -mm which might be from joserenato.santos@xxxxxx are
> >
> >
> >
> Andi, Did we finally settle on this patch for main line. I thought we
> wanted to get rid of the if condition completely. I still think that is
> the right solution.
Andi has merged this:
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt-current/patches/oprofile-p4-model
and yes, the secret undocumented kernel parameter has been whined about.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
