The patch titled
tty: fix TCSBRK comment
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
tty-fix-tcsbrk-comment.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: tty: fix TCSBRK comment
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fix TCSBRK comment to prevent confusion or accidental removal.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/tty_io.c~tty-fix-tcsbrk-comment drivers/char/tty_io.c
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c~tty-fix-tcsbrk-comment
+++ a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -2621,10 +2621,9 @@ int tty_ioctl(struct inode * inode, stru
tty->driver->break_ctl(tty, 0);
return 0;
case TCSBRK: /* SVID version: non-zero arg --> no break */
- /*
- * XXX is the above comment correct, or the
- * code below correct? Is this ioctl used at
- * all by anyone?
+ /* non-zero arg means wait for all output data
+ * to be sent (performed above) but don't send break.
+ * This is used by the tcdrain() termios function.
*/
if (!arg)
return send_break(tty, 250);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from paulkf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
remove-dead-entry-in-net-wan-kconfig.patch
remove-tty_dont_flip.patch
add-receive_room-flow-control-to-flush_to_ldisc.patch
add-receive_room-flow-control-to-flush_to_ldisc-tidy.patch
remove-active-field-from-tty-buffer-structure.patch
revert-tty-buffering-comment-out-debug-code.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
