The patch titled
remove steal_locks()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
remove-steal_locks.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: remove steal_locks()
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch removes the steal_locks() function.
steal_locks() doesn't work correctly with any filesystem that does it's own
lock management, including NFS, CIFS, etc.
In addition it has weird semantics on local filesystems in case tasks
sharing file-descriptor tables are doing POSIX locking operations in
parallel to execve().
The steal_locks() function has an effect on applications doing:
clone(CLONE_FILES)
/* in child */
lock
execve
lock
POSIX locks acquired before execve (by "child", "parent" or any further
task sharing files_struct) will after the execve be owned exclusively by
"child".
According to Chris Wright some LSB/LTP kind of suite triggers without the
stealing behavior, but there's no known real-world application that would
also fail.
Apps using NPTL are not affected, since all other threads are killed before
execve.
Apps using LinuxThreads are only affected if they
- have multiple threads during exec (LinuxThreads doesn't kill other
threads, the app may do it with pthread_kill_other_threads_np())
- rely on POSIX locks being inherited across exec
Both conditions are documented, but not their interaction.
Apps using clone() natively are affected if they
- use clone(CLONE_FILES)
- rely on POSIX locks being inherited across exec
The above scenarios are unlikely, but possible.
If the patch is vetoed, there's a plan B, that involves mostly keeping the
weird stealing semantics, but changing the way lock ownership is handled so
that network and local filesystems work consistently.
That would add more complexity though, so this solution seems to be
preferred by most people.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Steven French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 1
fs/binfmt_misc.c | 1
fs/exec.c | 1
fs/locks.c | 57 -------------------------------------------
include/linux/fs.h | 1
5 files changed, 61 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/binfmt_elf.c~remove-steal_locks fs/binfmt_elf.c
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c~remove-steal_locks
+++ a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -759,7 +759,6 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
/* Discard our unneeded old files struct */
if (files) {
- steal_locks(files);
put_files_struct(files);
files = NULL;
}
diff -puN fs/binfmt_misc.c~remove-steal_locks fs/binfmt_misc.c
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c~remove-steal_locks
+++ a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux
goto _error;
if (files) {
- steal_locks(files);
put_files_struct(files);
files = NULL;
}
diff -puN fs/exec.c~remove-steal_locks fs/exec.c
--- a/fs/exec.c~remove-steal_locks
+++ a/fs/exec.c
@@ -866,7 +866,6 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm *
bprm->mm = NULL; /* We're using it now */
/* This is the point of no return */
- steal_locks(files);
put_files_struct(files);
current->sas_ss_sp = current->sas_ss_size = 0;
diff -puN fs/locks.c~remove-steal_locks fs/locks.c
--- a/fs/locks.c~remove-steal_locks
+++ a/fs/locks.c
@@ -2206,63 +2206,6 @@ int lock_may_write(struct inode *inode,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_may_write);
-static inline void __steal_locks(struct file *file, fl_owner_t from)
-{
- struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
- struct file_lock *fl = inode->i_flock;
-
- while (fl) {
- if (fl->fl_file == file && fl->fl_owner == from)
- fl->fl_owner = current->files;
- fl = fl->fl_next;
- }
-}
-
-/* When getting ready for executing a binary, we make sure that current
- * has a files_struct on its own. Before dropping the old files_struct,
- * we take over ownership of all locks for all file descriptors we own.
- * Note that we may accidentally steal a lock for a file that a sibling
- * has created since the unshare_files() call.
- */
-void steal_locks(fl_owner_t from)
-{
- struct files_struct *files = current->files;
- int i, j;
- struct fdtable *fdt;
-
- if (from == files)
- return;
-
- lock_kernel();
- j = 0;
-
- /*
- * We are not taking a ref to the file structures, so
- * we need to acquire ->file_lock.
- */
- spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
- fdt = files_fdtable(files);
- for (;;) {
- unsigned long set;
- i = j * __NFDBITS;
- if (i >= fdt->max_fdset || i >= fdt->max_fds)
- break;
- set = fdt->open_fds->fds_bits[j++];
- while (set) {
- if (set & 1) {
- struct file *file = fdt->fd[i];
- if (file)
- __steal_locks(file, from);
- }
- i++;
- set >>= 1;
- }
- }
- spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
- unlock_kernel();
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(steal_locks);
-
static int __init filelock_init(void)
{
filelock_cache = kmem_cache_create("file_lock_cache",
diff -puN include/linux/fs.h~remove-steal_locks include/linux/fs.h
--- a/include/linux/fs.h~remove-steal_locks
+++ a/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -782,7 +782,6 @@ extern int setlease(struct file *, long,
extern int lease_modify(struct file_lock **, int);
extern int lock_may_read(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count);
extern int lock_may_write(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count);
-extern void steal_locks(fl_owner_t from);
struct fasync_struct {
int magic;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from miklos@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
add-page_mkwrite-vm_operations-method.patch
add-page_mkwrite-vm_operations-method-fix.patch
locks-dont-unnecessarily-fail-posix-lock-operations.patch
locks-dont-do-unnecessary-allocations.patch
locks-clean-up-locks_remove_posix.patch
vfs-add-lock-owner-argument-to-flush-operation.patch
fuse-use-misc_major.patch
fuse-no-backgrounding-on-interrupt.patch
fuse-add-control-filesystem.patch
fuse-add-control-filesystem-printk-fix.patch
fuse-add-posix-file-locking-support.patch
fuse-ensure-flush-reaches-userspace.patch
fuse-rename-the-interrupted-flag.patch
fuse-add-request-interruption.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
