The patch titled
s390: bug in setup_rt_frame
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
s390-bug-in-setup_rt_frame.patch
This patch was probably dropped from -mm because
it has now been merged into a subsystem tree or
into Linus's tree, or because it was folded into
its parent patch in the -mm tree.
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Consider return value of __put_user() when setting up a signal frame
instead of ignoring it.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/s390/kernel/signal.c~s390-bug-in-setup_rt_frame arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
--- devel/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c~s390-bug-in-setup_rt_frame 2006-05-01 12:15:34.000000000 -0700
+++ devel-akpm/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c 2006-05-01 12:15:34.000000000 -0700
@@ -358,8 +358,9 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struc
} else {
regs->gprs[14] = (unsigned long)
frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
- err |= __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
- (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode));
+ if (__put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
+ (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode)))
+ goto give_sigsegv;
}
/* Set up backchain. */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
rcu-introduce-rcu_needs_cpu-interface.patch
rcu-introduce-rcu_needs_cpu-interface-fix.patch
s390-exploit-rcu_needs_cpu-interface.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
