On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:21 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Ran Rozenstein <ranro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 09/12] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW > >> > >> Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW variant of socket timestamp options. > >> This is the y2038 safe versions of the SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD for all > >> architectures. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have app that include: > > #include <linux/errqueue.h> > > > > It now fail with this error: > > In file included from timestamping.c:6:0: > > /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:46:27: error: array type has incomplete element type 'struct __kernel_timespec' > > struct __kernel_timespec ts[3]; > > ^~ > > I tried to do the trivial fix, to include time.h: > > In include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h > > #include <linux/time.h> > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > > But it just add some other noises: > > In file included from /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:5:0, > > from timestamping.c:6: > > /usr/include/linux/time.h:10:8: error: redefinition of ?struct timespec? > > struct timespec { > > ^~~~~~~~ > > In file included from /usr/include/sys/select.h:39:0, > > from /usr/include/sys/types.h:197, > > from /usr/include/stdlib.h:279, > > from timestamping.c:2: > > /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timespec.h:8:8: note: originally defined here > > struct timespec > > ^~~~~~~~ > > In file included from /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:5:0, > > from timestamping.c:6: > > /usr/include/linux/time.h:16:8: error: redefinition of ?struct timeval? > > struct timeval { > > ^~~~~~~ > > In file included from /usr/include/sys/select.h:37:0, > > from /usr/include/sys/types.h:197, > > from /usr/include/stdlib.h:279, > > from timestamping.c:2: > > /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timeval.h:8:8: note: originally defined here > > struct timeval > > ^~~~~~~ > > > > > > Can you please advise how to solve it? > > > > Thanks, > > Ran > > The errqueue.h already had the same issue reported previously: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-L2ntuH54J_SwN9WcpBMgkV_v0e-Q2Pu2mrQ3+1RozGFQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Earlier when I tested this with kernel selftests such as > tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp(the test > was broken to begin with because of missing include of unistd.h), I > was using make.cross to build. > This does not put the headers in the right place > (obj-$ARCH/usr/include instead of usr/include). Hence, I did not > realize that this breaks the inclusion of errqueue.h due to the > missing __kernel_timespec definition. > I forgot that nobody seems to be using linux/time.h. > > But, if I include guards( #ifndef __KERNEL__) for struct timespec, > struct timeval etc for linux/time.h, then we can include it from > userspace/ errqueue.h for __kernel_timespec: > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_ERRQUEUE_H > #define _UAPI_LINUX_ERRQUEUE_H > > -#include <linux/types.h> > +#include <linux/time.h> > > struct sock_extended_err { > __u32 ee_errno; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/time.h b/include/uapi/linux/time.h > index a6aca9aaab80..40913d9a5bc8 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/time.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/time.h > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ > #include <linux/types.h> > > > +#ifdef __KERNEL__ > + > #ifndef _STRUCT_TIMESPEC > #define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC > struct timespec { > @@ -42,6 +44,8 @@ struct itimerval { > struct timeval it_value; /* current value */ > }; > > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > > Arnd, > > I forgot how we plan to include the definition for __kernel_timespec > for libc or userspace. Does this seem right to you? > Also these changes to errqueue.h needs to be reverted probably as this > breaks userspace. Arnd and I talked about this today morning. We agreed that we could introduce a new time_types.h along the lines of posix_types.h. We will move all the time definitions that we plan to keep in the kernel uapi headers to this header. This header will also not have any overlap with the sys/time.h and can be included along with it from userspace. I will post this patch shortly. This should fix Ran's issue. -Deepa