Re: Question about mmap syscall and POSIX standard on mips arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[mips folks Cc'd]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:26:02AM +0800, Hongzhi, Song wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Ltp has a POSIX teatcase about mmap, 24-2.c.
> 
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/e816127e5d8efbff5ae53e9c2292fae22f36838b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c#L94

[basically, MAP_FIXED mmap with addr + len > TASK_SIZE fails with
-EINVAL on mips and -ENOMEM elsewhere]
 
> Under POSIX standard, the expected errno should be ENOMEM
> 
> when the specific [addr+len] exceeds the bound of memory.

The mmap() function may fail if:

[EINVAL]
The addr argument (if MAP_FIXED was specified) or off is not a multiple
of the page size as returned by sysconf(), or is considered invalid by
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the implementation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So that behaviour gets past POSIX.  That part is mostly about the
things like cache aliasing constraints, etc., but it leaves enough
space to weasel out.  Said that, this

[ENOMEM]
MAP_FIXED was specified, and the range [addr,addr+len) exceeds that allowed
for the address space of a process; or, if MAP_FIXED was not specified and
there is insufficient room in the address space to effect the mapping.

is a lot more specific, so switching to -ENOMEM there might be a good idea,
especially since on other architectures we do get -ENOMEM in that case,
AFAICS.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux