Hi Alexandre,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 08:02:22PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 14/09/2018 18:26:38+0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:54:46PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 14/09/2018 11:44:26+0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > > > In order to use GPIO4 as a GPIO, we need to mux it in this mode so let's
> > > > declare a new pinctrl DT node for it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi
> > > > index 8ce317c..b5c4c74 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi
> > > > @@ -182,6 +182,11 @@
> > > > interrupts = <13>;
> > > > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > >
> > > > + gpio4: gpio4 {
> > > > + pins = "GPIO_4";
> > > > + function = "gpio";
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > >
> > > For a GPIO, I would do that in the board dts because it is not used
> > > directly in the dtsi.
> > >
> >
> > And the day we've two boards using this pinctrl we move it to a dtsi. Is
> > that the plan?
> >
>
> Not really, at least not for gpios. I've included the pinctrl for the
> uart, i2c and spi because they are the only option if you are to use
> those peripherals. Else, I've would have left the pinctrl to the board
> file. From my point of view, the gpios are too board specific to be in a
> soc dtsi.
>
Understood, will move it to the board file.
Thanks,
Quentin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
