From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200 > On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through >> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem. >> >> Hi Quentin >> >> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets >> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree. >> > > There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably > go through MIPS. No objection for this going through the MIPS tree, and from me: Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
