On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:13:02PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Does this BUG_ON() gets hit on mips? > > in 4.17.2 ./kernel/exit.c > > do_group_exit(int exit_code) > { > struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal; > > BUG_ON(exit_code & 0x80); > > |do_group_exit| is called from > > ./kernel/signal.c:2482: do_group_exit(ksig->info.si_signo); > > Appears to me si_signo can be 0x80 (in decimal 128) because of: > > arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/signal.h:15:#define _NSIG 128 > > Probably testcase will be: > $kill -128 `pidof program` I've hit this by accident before, while tweaking GDB on MIPS. See here: [RFC] kernel/signal.c: avoid BUG_ON with SIG128 (MIPS): https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5343/ [v2] MIPS: Reduce _NSIG from 128 to 127 to avoid BUG_ON: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5461/ [v3] kernel/signal.c: fix BUG_ON with SIG128 (MIPS): https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5538/ https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5550/ [v4] MIPS: Reduce _NSIG from 128 to 127 to avoid BUG_ON: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5564/ I think the fear of subtle user ABI breakage was probably prominent in why it never got properly fixed. It'd be nice to get some resolution though. Cheers James