Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:49 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > For the common cases where 1000 is a multiple of HZ, or HZ is a multiple
> > of 1000, jiffies_to_msecs() never returns zero when passed a non-zero
> > time period.
> >
> > However, if HZ > 1000 and not an integer multiple of 1000 (e.g. 1024 or
> > 1200, as used on alpha and DECstation), jiffies_to_msecs() may return
> > zero for small non-zero time periods. This may break code that relies
> > on receiving back a non-zero value.
> >
> > jiffies_to_usecs() does not need such a fix, as <linux/jiffies.h> does
> > not support values of HZ larger than 12287, thus rejecting any
> > problematic huge values of HZ.
>
> Sorry, I'm not understanding that sentence at all.
Sorry for being unclear.
1 jiffy can only be less than 1µs if HZ > 1000000.
But include/linux/jiffies.h checks if HZ >= 12288, and does #error otherwise.
In addition, there's a "BUILD_BUG_ON(HZ > USEC_PER_SEC)" in time.c
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This lacks a stable tag, right?
Up to the maintainer to add, isn't it?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
