On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:58:27 +0100,
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:43:47PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:37:52AM +1100, Oliver wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > >> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:04:22PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > >> >> On 03/28/2018 11:48 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >> >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:58:51AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > >> >> >> On 03/28/2018 10:26 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
> > >> >> >>> Now only those architectures that have custom initrd free requirements
> > >> >> >>> need to define free_initrd_mem.
> > >> >> >> ...
> > >> >> >>> --- a/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> > >> >> >>> +++ b/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> > >> >> >>> @@ -229,10 +229,3 @@ void __ref free_initmem(void)
> > >> >> >>> {
> > >> >> >>> free_initmem_default(-1);
> > >> >> >>> }
> > >> >> >>> -
> > >> >> >>> -#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
> > >> >> >>> -void __init free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > >> >> >>> -{
> > >> >> >>> - free_reserved_area((void *)start, (void *)end, -1, "initrd");
> > >> >> >>> -}
> > >> >> >>> -#endif
> > >> >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >> >> >>> index 3f972e83909b..19d1c5594e2d 100644
> > >> >> >>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >> >> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >> >> >>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config ARM
> > >> >> >>> select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> > >> >> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL if (AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT)
> > >> >> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if (CPU_32v7M || CPU_32v7) && !CPU_32v6
> > >> >> >>> + select HAVE_ARCH_FREE_INITRD_MEM
> > >> >> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> > >> >> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> > >> >> >>> select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Isn't this why weak symbols were invented?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Weak symbols means that we end up with both the weakly-referenced code
> > >> >> > and the arch code in the kernel image. That's fine if the weak code
> > >> >> > is small.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The kernel's been able to build with link time garbage collection since 2016:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b67067f1176d
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Wouldn't that remove the unused one?
> > >> >
> > >> > Probably, if anyone bothered to use that, which they don't.
> > >> >
> > >> > LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is a symbol without a prompt, and from
> > >> > what I can see, nothing selects it. Therefore, the symbol is always
> > >> > disabled, and so the feature never gets used in mainline kernels.
> > >> >
> > >> > Brings up the obvious question - why is it there if it's completely
> > >> > unused? (Maybe to cause confusion, and allowing a justification
> > >> > for __weak ?)
> > >>
> > >> IIRC Nick had some patches to do the arch enablement for powerpc, but
> > >> I'm not sure what happened to them though. I suspect it just fell down
> > >> Nick's ever growing TODO list.
> > >
> > > I've given it a go on ARM, marking every linker-built table with KEEP()
> > > and comparing the System.map files. The resulting kernel is around
> > > 150k smaller, which seems good.
> > >
> > > However, it doesn't boot - and I don't know why. Booting the kernel
> > > under kvmtool in a VM using virtio-console, I can find no way to get
> > > any kernel messages out of it. Using lkvm debug, I can see that the
> > > PC is stuck inside die(), and that's the only information I have.
> > > It dies before bringing up the other CPUs, so it's a very early death.
> > >
> > > I don't think other console types are available under ARM64.
> >
> > earlycon?
>
> Through what - as I say above, I think the only thing that's present is
> virtio-console, and the virtio stack only get initialised much later in
> boot.
>
> Eg, there's the memory-based virtio driver which interfaces any virtio
> driver to a memory-based ring structures for communication with the host
> (drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c) which is initialised at module_init()
> time, and so isn't available for earlycon.
>
> I don't think merely changing the module_init() calls in the appropriate
> virtio bits will suffice - it's why I pointed out that it dies before
> SMP initialisation, which also means that it dies before we start
> running the initcalls for subsystems and drivers.
>
> I'm not aware of there being an emulated UART in the guest's address
> space, so serial based stuff doesn't work.
"earlycon=uart,mmio,0x3f8" is what you're looking for:
$ Work/kvmtool/lkvm run -c2 -k zImage -p "earlycon=uart,mmio,0x3f8" --console virtio --aarch32
# lkvm run -k zImage -m 320 -c 2 --name guest-3856
Info: Loaded kernel to 0x80008000 (6767104 bytes)
Info: Placing fdt at 0x8fe00000 - 0x8fffffff
Info: virtio-mmio.devices=0x200@0x10000:36
Info: virtio-mmio.devices=0x200@0x10200:37
Info: virtio-mmio.devices=0x200@0x10400:38
[ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[ 0.000000] Linux version 4.16.0-rc6+ (maz@approximate) (gcc version 6.3.0 20170516 (Debian 6.3.0-18)) #8407 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 20 15:01:43 GMT 2018
[ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [410fd082] revision 2 (ARMv7), cr=30c5383d
[ 0.000000] CPU: div instructions available: patching division code
[ 0.000000] CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, PIPT instruction cache
[ 0.000000] OF: fdt: Machine model: linux,dummy-virt
[ 0.000000] earlycon: uart0 at MMIO 0x00000000000003f8 (options '')
[ 0.000000] bootconsole [uart0] enabled
[ 0.000000] Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
[ 0.000000] efi: Getting EFI parameters from FDT:
[ 0.000000] efi: UEFI not found.
[...]
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
