On Wed, Mar 21 2018, James Hogan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:29:51PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> ralink_halt() does nothing that machine_halt()
>> doesn't already do, so it adds no value.
>>
>> It actually causes incorrect behaviour due to the
>> "unreachable()" at the end. This tell the compiler that the
>> end of the function will never be reached, which isn't true.
>> The compiler responds by not adding a 'return' instruction,
>> so control simply moves on to whatever bytes come afterwards
>> in memory. In my tested, that was the ralink_restart()
>> function. This means that an attempt to 'halt' the machine
>> would actually cause a reboot.
>>
>> So remove ralink_halt() so that a 'halt' really does halt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks, I've cosmetically tweaked the commit message (mainly reflow to
> 72 characters) and added:
>
> Fixes: c06e836ada59 ("MIPS: ralink: adds reset code")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9+
>
> and applied for 4.16.
>
> BTW, I'm intrigued to know if there's a particular reason you don't
> author / sign-off as "Neil Brown"? Its supposed to be real names, though
> "NeilBrown" is hardly difficult to figure out so I don't actually
> object.
I started using NeilBrown way back when I was an undergrad student and
it stuck. When you grow up as a Brown, you know your name isn't going
to make you unique. e.g. I'm not an author of "Red Hat Linux System
Administration Unleashed" (he has a space in his name!!). So I chose a
different way to make my name distinctive.
Yes, it isn't technically compliant - you are the second person to
comment in the nearly twenty years I've been working on Linux :-)
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
