On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 06:51:36PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le 2018-03-09 16:12, Ezequiel Garcia a écrit : > > @@ -164,8 +171,46 @@ struct jz4740_mmc_host { > > * trigger is when data words in MSC_TXFIFO is < 8. > > */ > > #define JZ4740_MMC_FIFO_HALF_SIZE 8 > > + > > + void (*write_irq_mask)(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host, uint32_t val); > > + void (*write_irq_reg)(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host, uint32_t val); > > + uint32_t (*read_irq_reg)(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host); > > }; > > I'm not 100% fan about the callback idea, the original commit > (https://github.com/gcwnow/linux/commit/62472091) doesn't use them and > is > 30 lines shorter. > > I'm not terribly against either, so if nobody else bug on that, feel > free > to ignore my comment. I was thinking the same as Paul too to be honest. Unless there is a measurable benefit to having callbacks, I think its cleaner and more readable to stick to conditionals and normal abstractions where appropriate. Cheers James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature