On February 9, 2018 12:51:33 AM PST, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 09/02/18 02:10, Jaedon Shin wrote:
>> Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
>> pointers printed with %p are hashed. Use %px instead of %p to print
>> pointer value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>> index 55cfb986225b..f604c1d89b3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int __init bcm7038_l1_of_init(struct device_node
>*dn,
>> goto out_unmap;
>> }
>>
>> - pr_info("registered BCM7038 L1 intc (mem: 0x%p, IRQs: %d)\n",
>> + pr_info("registered BCM7038 L1 intc (mem: 0x%px, IRQs: %d)\n",
>> intc->cpus[0]->map_base, IRQS_PER_WORD * intc->n_words);
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>> index 983640eba418..1cc4dd1d584a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct
>device_node *dn,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - pr_info("registered %s intc (mem: 0x%p, parent IRQ(s): %d)\n",
>> + pr_info("registered %s intc (mem: 0x%px, parent IRQ(s): %d)\n",
>> intc_name, data->map_base[0], data->num_parent_irqs);
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>> index 691d20eb0bec..6760edeeb666 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct
>device_node *np,
>> ct->chip.irq_set_wake = irq_gc_set_wake;
>> }
>>
>> - pr_info("registered L2 intc (mem: 0x%p, parent irq: %d)\n",
>> + pr_info("registered L2 intc (mem: 0x%px, parent irq: %d)\n",
>> base, parent_irq);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>
>Why is that something useful to do? This just tells you where the
>device
>is mapped in the VA space, and I doubt that's a useful information,
>hashed pointers or not. Am I missing something obvious?
No you are right there is not much value in printing the register virtual address (sometimes there is e.g: on MIPS) either we fix the prints to show the physical address of the base register or we could possibly drop the prints entirely.
--
Florian
