On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:00:59PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxx> > > Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between Please refer to commits with e.g. commit 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing"). > PHYS_OFFSET and low memory address specified by mem= cmdline argument is > not later processed by free_all_bootmem. > This change was incorrect for systems where the commandline specifies > more than 1 mem argument, as it will cause all memory between > PHYS_OFFSET and each of the memory offsets to be marked as reserved, > which results in parts of the RAM marked as reserved (Creator CI20's > u-boot has a default commandline argument 'mem=256M@0x0 > mem=768M@0x30000000'). > > Change the behaviour to ensure that only the range between PHYS_OFFSET > and the lowest start address of the memories is marked as protected. > > This change also ensures that the range is marked protected even if it's > only defined through the devicetree and not only via commandline > arguments. > > Reported-by: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing") > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.11 I'm guessing that should technically be v4.11+ > --- > v2: Use updated email adress, add tag for stable. > arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c > index 702c678de116..f19d61224c71 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c > @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void) > unsigned long reserved_end; > unsigned long mapstart = ~0UL; > unsigned long bootmap_size; > + phys_addr_t ramstart = ~0UL; Although practically it might not matter, technically phys_addr_t may be 64-bits (CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT) even on a 32-bit kernels, in which case ~0UL may not be sufficiently large. Maybe that should be ~(phys_addr_t)0, or perhaps (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX to match add_memory_region(). > bool bootmap_valid = false; > int i; > > @@ -395,6 +396,21 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void) > max_low_pfn = 0; > > /* > + * Reserve any memory between the start of RAM and PHYS_OFFSET > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) { > + if (boot_mem_map.map[i].type != BOOT_MEM_RAM) > + continue; > + > + ramstart = min(ramstart, boot_mem_map.map[i].addr); Is it worth incorporating this into the existing loop below ... > + } > + > + if (ramstart > PHYS_OFFSET) > + add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, ramstart - PHYS_OFFSET, > + BOOT_MEM_RESERVED); ... and this then placed below that loop? Otherwise I can't find fault with this patch, though i'm not intimately familiar with bootmem. Cheers James > + > + > + /* > * Find the highest page frame number we have available. > */ > for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) { > @@ -664,9 +680,6 @@ static int __init early_parse_mem(char *p) > > add_memory_region(start, size, BOOT_MEM_RAM); > > - if (start && start > PHYS_OFFSET) > - add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, start - PHYS_OFFSET, > - BOOT_MEM_RESERVED); > return 0; > } > early_param("mem", early_parse_mem); > -- > 2.11.0 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature