On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Manuel Lauss wrote: > >> I'm unsure whether the patch is really correct, due to the unexpected >> binary size reduction. I do not have a hardfloat mips32 userland at hand >> therefore I'd appreciate it if someone could test it! > > What exactly are you unsure about? Double operations using odd register > indices in the 32-bit FPR mode are architecturally unpredictable. Is this > what concerns you? I was not able to find a definition for get_fpr by grepping the tree for it, so I wasn't sure whether only the LSB or all mattered. Manuel
