On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:39:19AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > > I suppose we need this too now that 4.12 is out: > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.12+ > > > > (Maybe Ralf can fix that stuff up when applying?) > > I think the Cc: to stable is not necessary with the Fixes: tag. I think the Cc is still advisable: amalon> gregkh: Does a fixes tag make Cc: stable unnecessary? (I thought not but maybe I'm mistaken) gregkh> amalon: nope. I do try to read all patches that do not have a cc: stable but just a fixes, but I don't always get to them, and they are _much_ lower priority. gregkh> amalon: so always cc: stable please. Cheers James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
