On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > numbers 0 > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > when it > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > ffffffff8092c78a > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > ffffffff80926678 > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > ffffffff80960000 > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > ffffffff80811d18 > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000040c00 > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > ... > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > with > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v5: > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > Changes in v4: None > > Changes in v3: None > > Changes in v2: None > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + > > 4, > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > irq_domain_add_linear() with > a size of 4: > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > INTD. Are > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 > space > to the 1-4 space? We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ 8/30/198 This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > > > > &intx_domain_ops, > > port); > > if (!port->leg_domain) { > > -- > > 2.13.1 > > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice. > This message may contain information that is confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any > attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and > delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
