From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0700 > On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700 >> >>> Changes from v1: >>> >>> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE >>> >>> - Added three more patches for other problems found. >>> >>> >>> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module >>> identified some failures and unimplemented features. >>> >>> With this patch set we get: >>> >>> test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] >>> >>> Both big and little endian tested. >>> >>> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. >> >> What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect >> them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree? >> >> Please be explicit about this in the future. >> > > Sorry I didn't mention it. > > My expectation is that Ralf would merge it via the MIPS tree, as it is > fully contained within arch/mips/* Great, thanks for letting me know.
