[PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont

[Joshua Kinard <kumba@xxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@xxxxxxxxxx>

In arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c, replace initial printk's in three
bug-checking functions with pr_info and replace several continuation
printk's with pr_info/pr_cont calls to avoid kernel log output like
this:

    [    0.899065] Checking for the daddi bug...
    [    0.899098] no.

This makes the output appear correctly:

    [    0.898643] Checking for the daddi bug... no.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
index a378e44688f5..d4483551a926 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 	long v1[8], v2[8], w[8];
 	int bug, fix, i;
 
-	printk("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
 
 	/*
 	 * Testing discovered false negatives for certain code offsets
@@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 			bug = 1;
 
 	if (bug == 0) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	fix = 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
@@ -160,11 +160,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 			fix = 0;
 
 	if (fix == 1) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !R4000_WAR ? r4kwar : nowar);
 }
 
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	void *handler;
 	long v, tmp;
 
-	printk("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	if (daddi_ov) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
@@ -236,11 +236,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	if (daddi_ov) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
 }
 
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 {
 	long v, w, tmp;
 
-	printk("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
 
 	/*
 	 * The following code leads to a wrong result of daddiu when
@@ -288,11 +288,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 	daddiu_bug = v != w;
 
 	if (!daddiu_bug) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	asm volatile(
 		"addiu	%2, $0, %3\n\t"
@@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 		: "I" (0xffffffffffffdb9aUL), "I" (0x1234));
 
 	if (v == w) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
 }