On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:53:23PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote: > 2016-10-20 14:16+0100, James Hogan: > > BTW, generally speaking do you always prefer pull requests to have the > > patches sent in reply to it, or only if they haven't already been posted > > for review? > > I strongly prefer pull requests that include only patches that were > already posted on the list and slightly prefer to omit the patch > replies. > > At least for me, a patch in a pull request has a FYI status instead of a > RFC status that a normal posting has. > > [I'd like if all patches in pull requests were already (re)viewed by > interested parties, so merge discussions could be high level or focus > on things that we learned while/after applying the patches, hence there > would be little benefit from reposting patches to the mailing list.] Good, I absolutely agree. Thanks James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
