Hi,
Thanks for the valuable feedback.
Comments inline
On 09/02/2016 11:27 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 2.9.2016 12:06, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
Hi,
On 09/02/2016 07:25 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 1.9.2016 18:50, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
The Xilinx AXI Interrupt Controller IP block is used by the MIPS
based xilfpga platform.
Move the interrupt controller code out of arch/microblaze so that
it can be used by everyone
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V3 -> V4
No change
V2 -> V3
No change here. Cleanup patches follow after this patch.
Its debatable to cleanup before/after move. Decided to place cleanup
after move to put history in new place.
V1 -> V2
Renamed irq-xilinx to irq-axi-intc
Renamed CONFIG_XILINX_INTC to CONFIG_XILINX_AXI_INTC
I see that this was suggested by Jason Cooper but using axi name here is
not correct.
There is xps-intc name which is the name used on old OPB hardware
designs. It means this driver can be still used only on system which
uses it.
Wouldn't axi-intc be more suitable moving forwards?
The IP block is now known as axi intc for 5 years as far as I can tell.
Searching "axi intc" online results in the right docs for current and
future platforms.
yes but we still should support older platform and it is more then this.
This is soft-IP core and in future when there is new bus then IP will
just change bus interface, etc.
That makes sense. I'll rename the driver to irq-xps-intc.c
and CONFIG_XILINX_XPS_INTC
Please shout now if anybody has issues with this.
Regards,
ZubairLK
