On 1.9.2016 18:51, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote: > At the moment, if the emaclite device doesn't find a mac address > from any source, it simply uses 0x0 with a warning printed. > > Instead of using a 0x0 mac address, use a randomly generated one. > > Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > V3 -> V4 > Curly braces after if check for correct styling > > V2 -> V3 > No change > > V1 -> V2 > New patch > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c > index 3cee84a..efc8d2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c > @@ -1131,11 +1131,13 @@ static int xemaclite_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) > lp->rx_ping_pong = get_bool(ofdev, "xlnx,rx-ping-pong"); > mac_address = of_get_mac_address(ofdev->dev.of_node); > > - if (mac_address) > + if (mac_address) { > /* Set the MAC address. */ > memcpy(ndev->dev_addr, mac_address, ETH_ALEN); > - else > - dev_warn(dev, "No MAC address found\n"); > + } else { > + dev_warn(dev, "No MAC address found. Generating Random one\n"); > + eth_hw_addr_random(ndev); > + } > > /* Clear the Tx CSR's in case this is a restart */ > __raw_writel(0, lp->base_addr + XEL_TSR_OFFSET); > You should remove these 2 emaclite patches and send them separately because they should go via netdev tree. Thanks, Michal